A witness has told a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja that the embattled leader of the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, admitted operating an illegal radio station and inciting members of the public to attack police officers.
The second witness, an official of the Department of State Services (DSS), identified with the name BBB in line with the court’s shielding of witnesses’ identities, said Kanu also founded the Eastern Security Network (ESN), a militia wing of the separatist movement.
Led in evidence by the prosecuting lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), BBB testified that Kanu operated an illegal radio station, which broadcast on frequencies 102.1 FM and 88.0 FM, which was not licensed by the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC).
BBB said he was on July 2021, given the duty of taking Kanu’s statement following a letter from the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) requesting that the IPOB leader be investigated for his alleged terrorism activities.
The witness said he carried out the assignment in the company of four other colleagues. He said he handed Kanu the letter from the AGF, which the defendant read and also gave his lawyers to read, following which he requested that Kanu respond to the issues raised in the letter.
He said that after reading the letter, Kanu volunteered to make a statement in the presence of two of his lawyers, including Alloy Ejimakor.
The witness said he played some of the broadcasts made by the defendant on his radio station (Radio Biafra), including where he called for the attack on police officers and made other inciting remarks.
Witness BBB said Kanu admitted that the voice in the broadcast, which he played to his hearing, was his (Kanu’s) own.
On what Kanu was agitating about, the witness said Kanu wanted the secession of the five South East states, parts of Kogi and Benue states, from the rest of Nigeria.
The witness said the defendant’s statement-taking session was recorded on video.
At that point, Awomolo showed the witness a copy of a compact disc, which BBB identified as containing the recording of his interaction with Kanu.
Awomolo then applied to tender the letter from the AGF, the disc and a certificate of compliance.
But, lawyer to the defence, Kanu Agabi (SAN), abruptly objected to the prosecution’s application to tender the items, arguing that the defence was not served with the AGF letter and the video recording.
Agabi said it was part of the right of the defendant to be given copies of all documents and materials that the prosecution planned to rely on in prosecuting the case.
Awomolo said he was ready to furnish the defendant with all the necessary documents and materials that the prosecution wishes to rely on.
While ruling, Justice James Omotosho held that the defence was entitled to all the documents and materials the prosecution planned to rely on.
Justice Omotosho proceeded to order the prosecution to, in line with the provision of Section 36 of the Constitution, serve on the defendant all facilities, including documents that it intends to rely on to prosecute the case.
Upon an application by Awomolo, Justice Omotosho adjourned till May 7 to enable the prosecution to serve the defence of all the necessary documents and for the PW 2 to continue his testimony.
Post Views: 41
