On Thursday, the Federal High Court in Abuja heard vital testimony as Yahaya Bello’s trial proceeded.
Auditor Nicholas Ojehomon from AISA actively explained financial transactions associated with Bello’s children’s education, providing critical insights into the case.
During cross-examination, Ojehomon clarified that while the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had identified $845,852.84 in questionable payments made to the school, only $760,910.84 was refunded. He emphasized the withheld $84,942 represented legitimate tuition fees for services already rendered. “This amount reflects actual educational services provided during the academic session,” Ojehomon stated firmly.
The courtroom atmosphere grew tense as defence counsel J.B. Daudu, SAN, challenged the witness’s testimony. Daudu questioned whether the school had properly documented its billing calculations, to which Ojehomon responded by detailing AISA’s standard accounting procedures. “Our records clearly show the breakdown between advance payments and earned tuition,” he maintained.
Prosecution counsel Olukayode Eniola, SAN, intervened when the defence’s questioning appeared to veer into speculative territory. “This witness is here to present facts, not opinions,” Eniola argued, prompting a brief but heated exchange between legal teams.
The proceedings took an unexpected turn when lead prosecutor Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, expressed frustration over repeated delays. “We’ve brought 28 witnesses, yet only three have testified due to constant adjournments,” Pinheiro lamented. His remarks highlighted the case’s complexity and the prosecution’s determination to present a thorough case.
Justice Emeka Nwite ultimately adjourned the matter to May 9, 2025, stressing the need for both parties to prepare adequately. “This court expects all documents to be properly reviewed before the next hearing,” Nwite directed.
The case continues to attract significant public attention, with many viewing it as a test of Nigeria’s anti-corruption efforts. Bello faces 19 charges including money laundering and criminal breach of trust involving N80.2 billion. Legal analysts suggest the school fees issue, while relatively small compared to the total allegations, could prove significant in establishing patterns of financial conduct.
Observers note the EFCC appears determined to pursue all aspects of the case meticulously. “Every transaction matters in building a comprehensive picture,” remarked a court reporter familiar with the proceedings. As the trial progresses, both sides are preparing for what promises to be an extended legal battle with potentially far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s political and financial accountability landscape.
Post Views: 50
